WebIn 1994Lord Justice Hoffmann gave a good summary of the process of determining market value in IRC v Gray [1994] STC 360 (CA) 371–72: “The property must be assumed to have been capable of sale in the open market – the hypothesis must be applied to the property as it actually existed even if in real life a vendor would have been likely to have …
IRC v Gray [1994] STC 360 – Law Journals
WebIRC v Gray [1994] STC 360 Pointe Gourde Quarrying and Transport Co Ltd v Sub-Intendent of Crown Lands [1947] AC 565 Port of London Authority v Transport for London[2008] R.V.R. 93 Raja Vyricherla Narayana Gajapatiraju v The Revenue Divisional Officer, Vizagapatam [1939] AC 302 Telereal Trillium v Hewitt[2024] EWCA Civ 26 Table of contents Paragraph WebThe application of this case to Section 272(1) TCGA 1992determines the tax value for purposes of the capital gains tax treatment. Typically there is a need for a market in the shares to facilitate the position, a factor which appears to be the start point for HMRC’s deliberations on this matter. how to take down flag pole dayz
The Share Valuation Implications for Employee Share Scheme
WebSep 25, 2009 · IRC v Gray [1994] STC 360 Co-operative Wholesale Society Ltd v National Westminster Bank plc [1995] 1 EGLR 97 Williams (VO) v Scottish & Newcastle Retail Ltd [2001] RA 41 Chiltern-Merryweather v Hunt [2008] RA 357 DECISION Introduction WebMarket value for tax – real transactions The whole world is free to bid and form a view as to best price ( [IRC v Gray] 1994 STC 360) Real transactions Market must be open – mere private deals not same as open market ones (Re Lynall [1971] 3 All ER 914) Allowance must be made for fact that real sale is not in the open market (Mc. WebJul 2, 2007 · At oral argument, Gray's counsel conceded on behalf of both defendants that defendants' Ex Post Facto Clause sentencing argument, based on United States v. Booker, … how to take down bali cellular blinds